Sunday, July 4, 2010
It may be a miscalculation for Ugandans abroad to return home now
The New Vision, Wednesday, June 23 2010 reported that the Archbishop of Kampala, Dr Cyprian Kizito Lwanga urged Ugandans in the Diaspora to return and develop the country. The Archbishop made the remarks during a celebration to mark the feast of the Uganda Martyrs at St. Mary’s Parish at Waltham, Massachusetts in the U S.
I am of the opinion that most Ugandans would love to be home; however, many Ugandans are dying so many times as they try to make ends meet here at home. The situation is simply not healthy in that for many people it is a nightmare making ends meet. Many Ugandans are working so hard to survive/or make a living under the hard economic situation which is the creation of the NRM Government. One needs to have serious investments home like houses to gamble and leave work abroad to come home. Much of what is paid locally does not constitute a living wage hence the reason why corruption is on the increase. Many children in high institutions of learning are being supported by relatives out of the country. Here we are heading for a general election against those who think that it is their birth right to lead government because they fought. There is so much uncertainty such that it would be most unfortunate for one to make a decision to come back to Uganda under the current circumstances where even investments are very hard given that the taxes in place in most cases don’t make economic sense the reason why people have to cheat and do a lot of other wrong things simply to make ends meet.
William Kituuka
Ugandans abroad urged to return home
Tuesday, 22nd June, 2010
By Jude Kafuuma
Lwanga (right) sharing a light moment with Byanyima in the US
THE Archbishop of Kampala, Dr. Cyprian Kizito Lwanga, has urged Ugandans in the diaspora to return and develop the country.
“It is good to move out in places like America and get experience, but please come back home and develop your roots. This is where you belong,” he said.
Lwanga made the remarks on Sunday during celebrations to mark the feast of the Uganda Martyrs at St. Mary’s Parish at Waltham, Massachusetts in the US.
The celebrations started in June 1978, spearheaded by Dr. Aloysius Lugira and his wife, Agnes Lugira, in the Archdiocese of Boston.
Lwanga described Boston, the state capital and largest city of Massachusetts, as the Namugongo of the US.
Ugandans throng Namugongo in Kampala every June 3 to celebrate Martyrs’ Day.
This year, the Archbishop of Boston, Sean Patrick Cardinal O’Malley, invited Lwanga to preside over the celebrations.
Lwanga urged Ugandans to be proud of their country, know more about the martyrs and teach children the good examples left by young martyrs like Kizito.
The cleric called upon Ugandans in the diaspora to pray for peace, justice and reconciliation through the intercession of the martyrs.
Emmanuel Wasswa and Emmanuel Musiitwa got awards for their outstanding service to the Catholic community in Boston.
The Uganda Catholic community hosted guests to a dinner at the Watertown Cultural Centre.
Democratic Party president Norbert Mao, Forum for Democratic Change president Kizza Besigye and his wife, Winnie Byanyima, attended the feast.
I am of the opinion that most Ugandans would love to be home; however, many Ugandans are dying so many times as they try to make ends meet here at home. The situation is simply not healthy in that for many people it is a nightmare making ends meet. Many Ugandans are working so hard to survive/or make a living under the hard economic situation which is the creation of the NRM Government. One needs to have serious investments home like houses to gamble and leave work abroad to come home. Much of what is paid locally does not constitute a living wage hence the reason why corruption is on the increase. Many children in high institutions of learning are being supported by relatives out of the country. Here we are heading for a general election against those who think that it is their birth right to lead government because they fought. There is so much uncertainty such that it would be most unfortunate for one to make a decision to come back to Uganda under the current circumstances where even investments are very hard given that the taxes in place in most cases don’t make economic sense the reason why people have to cheat and do a lot of other wrong things simply to make ends meet.
William Kituuka
Ugandans abroad urged to return home
Tuesday, 22nd June, 2010
By Jude Kafuuma
Lwanga (right) sharing a light moment with Byanyima in the US
THE Archbishop of Kampala, Dr. Cyprian Kizito Lwanga, has urged Ugandans in the diaspora to return and develop the country.
“It is good to move out in places like America and get experience, but please come back home and develop your roots. This is where you belong,” he said.
Lwanga made the remarks on Sunday during celebrations to mark the feast of the Uganda Martyrs at St. Mary’s Parish at Waltham, Massachusetts in the US.
The celebrations started in June 1978, spearheaded by Dr. Aloysius Lugira and his wife, Agnes Lugira, in the Archdiocese of Boston.
Lwanga described Boston, the state capital and largest city of Massachusetts, as the Namugongo of the US.
Ugandans throng Namugongo in Kampala every June 3 to celebrate Martyrs’ Day.
This year, the Archbishop of Boston, Sean Patrick Cardinal O’Malley, invited Lwanga to preside over the celebrations.
Lwanga urged Ugandans to be proud of their country, know more about the martyrs and teach children the good examples left by young martyrs like Kizito.
The cleric called upon Ugandans in the diaspora to pray for peace, justice and reconciliation through the intercession of the martyrs.
Emmanuel Wasswa and Emmanuel Musiitwa got awards for their outstanding service to the Catholic community in Boston.
The Uganda Catholic community hosted guests to a dinner at the Watertown Cultural Centre.
Democratic Party president Norbert Mao, Forum for Democratic Change president Kizza Besigye and his wife, Winnie Byanyima, attended the feast.
Unprecedented Support from the World Bank to Help Africa Recover from the Crisis
Record Commitments in Education, Health, Nutrition, Population,
and Infrastructure in FY10
WASHINGTON, July 1, 2010— The World Bank committed a record of $11.5 billion to Africa in fiscal year 2010 (July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010), helping the region recover rapidly from the financial crisis. The Bank Group supported 113 projects, with $4.3 billion in commitments from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which provides financing, risk management products, and other financial services to countries, and $7.2 billion in commitments from the International Development Association, which provides interest-free loans and grants to the world’s poorest countries.
“Today, as Africa is one of the first continents to emerge from the crisis and has the prospect of returning before most other regions to the solid growth pattern it had experienced before the crisis, I am glad that our institution was there to help, and was part of their solution.” said World Bank Africa’s Vice President, Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili. “This year saw an unprecedented level of lending to shore economies back to the path of recovery. The constant focus on results and relevant and timely knowledge products made a difference for the people of Africa.”
The World Bank Group committed more than $72 billion in fiscal year 2010, an unprecedented level of Bank Group assistance for developing countries as the world faces a fragile and uneven recovery.
In FY10, the Bank Group supported an estimated 875 projects to promote economic growth, overcome poverty, and promote private enterprise, with record commitments in education, health, nutrition, population, and infrastructure providing much-needed investments in crisis-hit economies.
This assistance was provided in loans, grants, equity investments and guarantees to help countries and private businesses contending with significantly diminished private capital flows in the wake of the global downturn. Private flows are forecast to recover only modestly from $454 billion in 2009 to $771 billion by 2012, still far below the $1.2 trillion in 2007. Overall, the financing gap of developing countries is projected to be $210 billion in 2010, declining to $180 billion in 2011—down from an estimated $352 billion in 2009.
“Our developing country partners needed the Bank to be fast, flexible, and innovative in the face of the global economic crisis, and I’m very pleased we were able to respond with record levels of assistance,” said World Bank Group President Robert B. Zoellick. “The harmful effects of the crisis on the poorest will be felt long after the global economy rebounds, and I believe it is critical that we are able to provide such strong support for social safety nets, infrastructure, and the private sector, in order to protect the poor and lay the foundation for recovery and growth.”
Commitments from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), hit an unprecedented $44.2 billion, up sharply from the previous record of $32.9 billion in FY09. Fast-disbursing Development Policy Loans, providing critical balance-of-payments support amid financing gaps, comprised nearly 47 percent of the overall total for FY10. Disbursements for Development Policy Loans kept pace with commitments approved, disbursing 85 percent of operations approved since July 2008 (excluding deferred drawdown operations).
Commitments from the International Development Association (IDA), rose to a new record high of $14.5 billion in FY10, from $14 billion in FY09. Africa this year has accounted for half of the IDA commitments.
World Bank (IBRD and IDA) commitments for social protection—including safety net programs for the poorest and most vulnerable—are estimated to reach at least $3.6 billion in FY10. Financing for infrastructure, a critical sector for job creation and future productivity, surpassed FY09’s $18 billion, and is estimated to reach more than $22 billion in FY10. FY10 also saw education commitments at an all-time high of around $4.5 billion, up from $3.4 billion in FY09; and record support for health, nutrition and population, which is estimated at $4 billion, up significantly from $2.9 billion last year. As the institution made these unprecedented commitments, with total FY09/10 Bank Group commitments at over $130 billion, the IBRD faced capital constraints, and shareholders agreed in April 2010 to the first major capital increase in 20 years.
Disbursements from IBRD and IDA – an important measure of impact on the ground – also reached record levels, and are expected to be around $40 billion, up from $28 billion in FY09, due to concerted and sustained efforts by Bank Management and staff to respond more quickly to client demand.
IFC, the largest provider of multilateral financing for the private sector in developing countries, provided a record amount of financing to businesses in developing countries, strengthening their ability to cope with uncertain global economic conditions. Preliminary and unaudited data as of June 29 indicated IFC investments totaled almost $18 billion, marking an increase from $14.5 billion in FY09. That included an estimated $12 billion in commitments made on IFC’s own account and more than $5 billion mobilized from other investors to supplement IFC financing. Resources mobilized from other investors included $235.8 million raised by IFC Asset Management Company (AMC), a wholly owned subsidiary of IFC that acts as an independent manager of third-party capital. The number of IFC investment projects rose to more than 500 as of June 29 how about June 30?, an increase of about 12 percent over FY09. Expenditures by IFC Advisory Services are expected to reach about $300 million.
IFC also maintained its strategic focus on the poorest countries and regions—especially sub-Saharan Africa, where IFC investments climbed to slightly over $2 billion as of June 29, a record. IFC investments in the 79 countries eligible to borrow from IDA totaled more than $4 billion. Nearly half of all IFC projects, and about 60 percent of Advisory Services project expenditures, were in these countries.
“In an unpredictable economic landscape, IFC directed significant financial resources into regions of the world where we could do the most good,” said Lars Thunell, IFC’s EVP and CEO. “We mobilized capital to address the major development challenges of our time. We leveraged our global expertise, developing innovative products and services to help our clients succeed. We catalyzed investment in emerging markets, demonstrating to investors that development and commercial success can go hand in hand in these markets.”
IFC’s achievements included several groundbreaking transactions and projects designed to create opportunity for people in the poorest countries and protect them from economic uncertainties. The IFC Capitalization Fund and the IFC African, Latin American, and Caribbean Fund—both managed by AMC—invested about $175 million in Africa’s Ecobank, which has the largest geographical presence in the region, to help expand access to credit in the poorest countries. IFC also invested $20 million in Leapfrog Financial Inclusion Fund, the world’s first commercial microinsurance fund. The fund is expected to help 25 million people in Africa obtain insurance.
The Bank Group’s political risk insurance agency, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) issued $1.5 billion in guarantees, up from $1.4 billion in FY09. “Despite subdued investor confidence and reduced FDI flows this year, MIGA continued to support investments that create jobs, provide basic infrastructure, and offer lending services to the real economy," said MIGA's Executive Vice President, Izumi Kobayashi. "We have stepped up to assist recovery and growth in developing countries during undeniably challenging times."
Commitments from the World Bank Group to sub-Saharan African countries—the Bank’s top priority—rose to $13.85 billion in FY10, up 28 percent from $9.9 billion in FY09. This included $7.2 billion from IDA, or 49 percent of total IDA commitments; $4.3 billion from IBRD; a record $2 billion from IFC; and $345 million in MIGA guarantees for projects in the region. IBRD and IDA disbursements in sub-Saharan African countries stood at $6 billion in FY10.
Despite the severity of the global crisis, the downturn did not result in an emerging market sovereign debt crisis of the type seen in the 1990s and 2000s, thanks mainly to prudent macro-economic management and debt management on the part of developing countries. In addition to financial commitments, the Bank assisted governments and sub-national entities in reducing their vulnerability to market volatility through technical assistance and by making risk management tools available to them. In FY10, the volume of risk management transactions executed by the Bank increased more than threefold compared to pre-crisis levels as member countries sought to more actively manage the risk on their debt portfolios.
and Infrastructure in FY10
WASHINGTON, July 1, 2010— The World Bank committed a record of $11.5 billion to Africa in fiscal year 2010 (July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010), helping the region recover rapidly from the financial crisis. The Bank Group supported 113 projects, with $4.3 billion in commitments from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which provides financing, risk management products, and other financial services to countries, and $7.2 billion in commitments from the International Development Association, which provides interest-free loans and grants to the world’s poorest countries.
“Today, as Africa is one of the first continents to emerge from the crisis and has the prospect of returning before most other regions to the solid growth pattern it had experienced before the crisis, I am glad that our institution was there to help, and was part of their solution.” said World Bank Africa’s Vice President, Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili. “This year saw an unprecedented level of lending to shore economies back to the path of recovery. The constant focus on results and relevant and timely knowledge products made a difference for the people of Africa.”
The World Bank Group committed more than $72 billion in fiscal year 2010, an unprecedented level of Bank Group assistance for developing countries as the world faces a fragile and uneven recovery.
In FY10, the Bank Group supported an estimated 875 projects to promote economic growth, overcome poverty, and promote private enterprise, with record commitments in education, health, nutrition, population, and infrastructure providing much-needed investments in crisis-hit economies.
This assistance was provided in loans, grants, equity investments and guarantees to help countries and private businesses contending with significantly diminished private capital flows in the wake of the global downturn. Private flows are forecast to recover only modestly from $454 billion in 2009 to $771 billion by 2012, still far below the $1.2 trillion in 2007. Overall, the financing gap of developing countries is projected to be $210 billion in 2010, declining to $180 billion in 2011—down from an estimated $352 billion in 2009.
“Our developing country partners needed the Bank to be fast, flexible, and innovative in the face of the global economic crisis, and I’m very pleased we were able to respond with record levels of assistance,” said World Bank Group President Robert B. Zoellick. “The harmful effects of the crisis on the poorest will be felt long after the global economy rebounds, and I believe it is critical that we are able to provide such strong support for social safety nets, infrastructure, and the private sector, in order to protect the poor and lay the foundation for recovery and growth.”
Commitments from the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), hit an unprecedented $44.2 billion, up sharply from the previous record of $32.9 billion in FY09. Fast-disbursing Development Policy Loans, providing critical balance-of-payments support amid financing gaps, comprised nearly 47 percent of the overall total for FY10. Disbursements for Development Policy Loans kept pace with commitments approved, disbursing 85 percent of operations approved since July 2008 (excluding deferred drawdown operations).
Commitments from the International Development Association (IDA), rose to a new record high of $14.5 billion in FY10, from $14 billion in FY09. Africa this year has accounted for half of the IDA commitments.
World Bank (IBRD and IDA) commitments for social protection—including safety net programs for the poorest and most vulnerable—are estimated to reach at least $3.6 billion in FY10. Financing for infrastructure, a critical sector for job creation and future productivity, surpassed FY09’s $18 billion, and is estimated to reach more than $22 billion in FY10. FY10 also saw education commitments at an all-time high of around $4.5 billion, up from $3.4 billion in FY09; and record support for health, nutrition and population, which is estimated at $4 billion, up significantly from $2.9 billion last year. As the institution made these unprecedented commitments, with total FY09/10 Bank Group commitments at over $130 billion, the IBRD faced capital constraints, and shareholders agreed in April 2010 to the first major capital increase in 20 years.
Disbursements from IBRD and IDA – an important measure of impact on the ground – also reached record levels, and are expected to be around $40 billion, up from $28 billion in FY09, due to concerted and sustained efforts by Bank Management and staff to respond more quickly to client demand.
IFC, the largest provider of multilateral financing for the private sector in developing countries, provided a record amount of financing to businesses in developing countries, strengthening their ability to cope with uncertain global economic conditions. Preliminary and unaudited data as of June 29 indicated IFC investments totaled almost $18 billion, marking an increase from $14.5 billion in FY09. That included an estimated $12 billion in commitments made on IFC’s own account and more than $5 billion mobilized from other investors to supplement IFC financing. Resources mobilized from other investors included $235.8 million raised by IFC Asset Management Company (AMC), a wholly owned subsidiary of IFC that acts as an independent manager of third-party capital. The number of IFC investment projects rose to more than 500 as of June 29 how about June 30?, an increase of about 12 percent over FY09. Expenditures by IFC Advisory Services are expected to reach about $300 million.
IFC also maintained its strategic focus on the poorest countries and regions—especially sub-Saharan Africa, where IFC investments climbed to slightly over $2 billion as of June 29, a record. IFC investments in the 79 countries eligible to borrow from IDA totaled more than $4 billion. Nearly half of all IFC projects, and about 60 percent of Advisory Services project expenditures, were in these countries.
“In an unpredictable economic landscape, IFC directed significant financial resources into regions of the world where we could do the most good,” said Lars Thunell, IFC’s EVP and CEO. “We mobilized capital to address the major development challenges of our time. We leveraged our global expertise, developing innovative products and services to help our clients succeed. We catalyzed investment in emerging markets, demonstrating to investors that development and commercial success can go hand in hand in these markets.”
IFC’s achievements included several groundbreaking transactions and projects designed to create opportunity for people in the poorest countries and protect them from economic uncertainties. The IFC Capitalization Fund and the IFC African, Latin American, and Caribbean Fund—both managed by AMC—invested about $175 million in Africa’s Ecobank, which has the largest geographical presence in the region, to help expand access to credit in the poorest countries. IFC also invested $20 million in Leapfrog Financial Inclusion Fund, the world’s first commercial microinsurance fund. The fund is expected to help 25 million people in Africa obtain insurance.
The Bank Group’s political risk insurance agency, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) issued $1.5 billion in guarantees, up from $1.4 billion in FY09. “Despite subdued investor confidence and reduced FDI flows this year, MIGA continued to support investments that create jobs, provide basic infrastructure, and offer lending services to the real economy," said MIGA's Executive Vice President, Izumi Kobayashi. "We have stepped up to assist recovery and growth in developing countries during undeniably challenging times."
Commitments from the World Bank Group to sub-Saharan African countries—the Bank’s top priority—rose to $13.85 billion in FY10, up 28 percent from $9.9 billion in FY09. This included $7.2 billion from IDA, or 49 percent of total IDA commitments; $4.3 billion from IBRD; a record $2 billion from IFC; and $345 million in MIGA guarantees for projects in the region. IBRD and IDA disbursements in sub-Saharan African countries stood at $6 billion in FY10.
Despite the severity of the global crisis, the downturn did not result in an emerging market sovereign debt crisis of the type seen in the 1990s and 2000s, thanks mainly to prudent macro-economic management and debt management on the part of developing countries. In addition to financial commitments, the Bank assisted governments and sub-national entities in reducing their vulnerability to market volatility through technical assistance and by making risk management tools available to them. In FY10, the volume of risk management transactions executed by the Bank increased more than threefold compared to pre-crisis levels as member countries sought to more actively manage the risk on their debt portfolios.
New World Bank Access to Information Policy Took Effect July 1, 2010
The innovations by the World Bank are great,however, as a Ugandan I am interested in knowing the various areas where the Government of Uganda has got funding and how from the Bank's point of view this money has been utilised. The problem we still have is that the Bank releases the funds which a number of generations have to pay back, but as to whether the bank does enough to ensure that it safeguards the Ugandans against those who outrightly steal this money for their own ends remains the concern of some of us who want to see a better country after so much money has been borrowed.
William Kituuka
From July 1, the World Bank started implementing the new Access to Information Policy. The new policy positions the Bank as a transparency leader among multilateral organizations. It moves the Bank from an approach that spelled out what information would be made publicly available under the current disclosure policy, to one that enables public availability of all information in the Bank’s possession that is not on a clear list of exceptions, such as staff personal information and deliberative documents.
The new policy provides for much greater access to information about projects under implementation to enable the public to track a project through the course of the project lifecycle.
The new Access to Information Policy is much more than a simple policy change. It is an enormous cultural shift for the institution, both in terms of how we engage with the outside world and how we view and handle information.
The Bank will make much more information available on key decisions made during project development and implementation to enable greater awareness of Bank-supported operations and better development results. New information that will be available includes decisions of Project Concept Review meetings, project supervision missions, and mid-term project reviews. Examples of newly available information after July 1 include:
* Minutes of Board Committee meetings
* Chairman’s summaries of Board meetings and Committee of the Whole meetings
* Summaries of Discussion
* Annual Reports of Board Committees
* Implementation Status and Results Reports (portions)
* Audited annual financial statements of borrowers for projects (for which the invitation to negotiate is issued after July 1, 2010)
* Country Portfolio Performance Reviews
* Concept notes and consultation plans for policy reviews that are subject to external consultations
The AI external site is up and went live last evening! Please check www.worldbank.org/wbaccess, you will find some really neat features.
Attached, please find the Access to Information Policy Statement to assist you with understanding the new policy further.
The AI Policy Statement
(See attached file: AI_Policy_Statement_Final.pdf)
**************************************************************
Sheila B. Gashishiri
Public Information Assistant
Africa Region External Affairs (AFREX), The World Bank
4th Floor, Rwenzori House, 1 Lumumba Ave, Kampala
Tel: +256-414.231.230/ +256-312.221416/7
Direct Tel: +256-414.302.248
DAMA: 5393.2248
William Kituuka
From July 1, the World Bank started implementing the new Access to Information Policy. The new policy positions the Bank as a transparency leader among multilateral organizations. It moves the Bank from an approach that spelled out what information would be made publicly available under the current disclosure policy, to one that enables public availability of all information in the Bank’s possession that is not on a clear list of exceptions, such as staff personal information and deliberative documents.
The new policy provides for much greater access to information about projects under implementation to enable the public to track a project through the course of the project lifecycle.
The new Access to Information Policy is much more than a simple policy change. It is an enormous cultural shift for the institution, both in terms of how we engage with the outside world and how we view and handle information.
The Bank will make much more information available on key decisions made during project development and implementation to enable greater awareness of Bank-supported operations and better development results. New information that will be available includes decisions of Project Concept Review meetings, project supervision missions, and mid-term project reviews. Examples of newly available information after July 1 include:
* Minutes of Board Committee meetings
* Chairman’s summaries of Board meetings and Committee of the Whole meetings
* Summaries of Discussion
* Annual Reports of Board Committees
* Implementation Status and Results Reports (portions)
* Audited annual financial statements of borrowers for projects (for which the invitation to negotiate is issued after July 1, 2010)
* Country Portfolio Performance Reviews
* Concept notes and consultation plans for policy reviews that are subject to external consultations
The AI external site is up and went live last evening! Please check www.worldbank.org/wbaccess, you will find some really neat features.
Attached, please find the Access to Information Policy Statement to assist you with understanding the new policy further.
The AI Policy Statement
(See attached file: AI_Policy_Statement_Final.pdf)
**************************************************************
Sheila B. Gashishiri
Public Information Assistant
Africa Region External Affairs (AFREX), The World Bank
4th Floor, Rwenzori House, 1 Lumumba Ave, Kampala
Tel: +256-414.231.230/ +256-312.221416/7
Direct Tel: +256-414.302.248
DAMA: 5393.2248
Friday, July 2, 2010
When LC 1 Chairpersons prove inefficient because they want VOTES!
If it were possible to go back to the local governance system that was in place before the coming into office of the NRM where we would have village and parish chiefs appointed by some authority, I think we would have better service delivery as compared to the current situation where the existing 'illegal' LC's are not able to stand on their feet and say a no to the wrongs going on in their areas of jurisdiction, simply because they don't want to annoy the voters who may end up denying them votes come 2011.
A case in point is Kajjansi trading centre where the petty traders who had been got off the road side that is along Nakigalala road are slowly and steadily coming back and no body seems to raise a finger! This is a narrow road where at times the vehicles make such a jam that even affects vehicles on Entebbe Highway. Those who go to St. Mary's Kitende Secondary know this alternative route which is equally used by those going to Kiwanirembe. We simply should not sit back and see chaos because we have LC's who fear to annoy the electorate. When it comes to garbage, it is equally bad news. The authorities in Wakiso ought to do something. I hope the situation may not be very different in other parts of the country.
A case in point is Kajjansi trading centre where the petty traders who had been got off the road side that is along Nakigalala road are slowly and steadily coming back and no body seems to raise a finger! This is a narrow road where at times the vehicles make such a jam that even affects vehicles on Entebbe Highway. Those who go to St. Mary's Kitende Secondary know this alternative route which is equally used by those going to Kiwanirembe. We simply should not sit back and see chaos because we have LC's who fear to annoy the electorate. When it comes to garbage, it is equally bad news. The authorities in Wakiso ought to do something. I hope the situation may not be very different in other parts of the country.
Thursday, July 1, 2010
It surprises that Mr. Vincent B Ssekonno has appointments during NRM administration
Mr. B. Ssekonno was the boss of the Electoral Commission during the 1980 greatly disputed elections; as it is believed that the electoral commission altered results at the time hence UPC ended up taking the victory of the Democratic Party! It is this major reason that those who went to the BUSH in 1981 advanced as the major cause for the war so as to rectify the situation.
If the above reasoning is true, it defeats simple logic how the NRM Government could deploy/employ Mr. Ssekonno whose role at the time is believed to have been party to the reason why the war was wagged. Remember that war claimed so many innocent lives, a lot of property was lost and some parts where it was 'staged' have never recovered. Mr Ssekonno is former Permanent Secretary Ministry of Local Government and noe Board Chairman National Social Security Fund!
William Kituuka
UGANDA'S FLAWED ELECTIONS: Bwengye spits fire at flawed poll and the Commonwealth report: Source - http://www.monitor.co.ug/SpecialReports/Elections/-/859108/861060/-/item/2/-/122pv4f/-/index.html
Posted Thursday, October 20 2005 at 17:51
All these malpractices during the polling could not be observed by the COG simply because they had no representative observers at each polling station. And yet in the memorandum of agreement between "the Government of Uganda and the Commonwealth Secretariat, the Group’s functions during and after polling were clearly spelled out in the following terms: “The Group will observe the conduct of the poll in all its aspects with right of access to all polling stations and supervising officers.
The Group will need to satisfy themselves about all relevant matters including the handling of ballot boxes, the counting of votes after polling, and the declaration of the result of the poll.”
The group was thinly deployed on the ground. A Group of about sixty people was expected to observe nearly three thousand polling stations, each one miles apart and most of them inaccessible by road.
What the COG staff did was to stay only certain places and "monitor complaints" from there. They all stayed in hotels at headquarters of artificially divided areas or regions.
A questionnaire to all our party agents at each polling station throughout the country showed that over 62% of the polling stations were not visited by any member of the COG team. The COG concentrated on Buganda and some parts of Busoga for two major reasons:
(a) The UPC had, through the Chairman of the Military Commission, and the Electroral Commission, convinced them that these were the controversial areas where the COG ought to concentrate;
(b) Most polling stations were inter-connnected by a network of passable roads (all weather roads as well as bulungi-bwansi roads).
Outside Busoga and Buganda the rigging was open and rampant. In the few polling stations where members of the group reached, they made the following report: “A large number of polling stations lacked either seals or padlocks for the ballot boxes, and, additionally, party labels for the boxes were often in short supply.... A number of polling stations we visited were ill-suited for the flow of people at the rate required. Some used the entrance doors also as an exit. Others had the ballot boxes in a separate room so that a person waiting to enter the room to vote had no idea how long he should wait or whether the person ahead of him had long since left the room. In one polling station voters had to use a window as their exit.”
If the group had reached most of the stations, especially in areas such as Bushcnyi, Rukungiri. Kabale. Tororo. Mbale, Gulu and Kitgum, where the UPC had planned to concentrate their rigging, they would have discovered worse malpractices.
The Group had the guts to report: “It was clear beyond doubt that the populace at large was voting in an atmosphere devoid of coercion and intimidation, and were doing so freely and in assured secrecy for candidates of their own choice."
If the group was not dishonest here, then it was grossly negligent in its duties.
The Counting of Votes and Announcement of Results
The history of elections in Uganda has shown that whenever elections took place, rigging took place at all stages, but counting of the votes became the worst stage. Boxes would be carried from polling stations to central counting places. Some of these boxes would disappear on the way, others would be broken into and votes stolen.
Cogent evidence showed that some unscrupulous polling stall would interchange the labels from the boxes or open the boxes and steal some votes from one box and put them into another box.
So when it came to the 1980 general election, the DP and UPM demanded that the counting be done on the spot at each polling station.
The poll was scheduled to start at 8.00 a.m. and end at 6.00 p.m. on the 10th day of December 1980, which was the gazetted day. At the close of the day counting of votes commenced as the Electoral Commissions' radio announcement had directed. By the afternoon the Military Commission started getting feelers from UPC agents throughout the country that the DP had won over 50% of the seats where so far counting had been completed. The UPC, the Electoral Commission and the Military Commission panicked. Then they decided to extend the poll to 2.00 p.m. on 11th December. The Electoral Commission made an announcement to that effect.
The Group was relieved from tension in which the Proclamation put them when on the morning of the following day, Paulo Muwanga had in advance of their representations, prepared a press statement which he had, allegedly agreed upon with the "leaders" of the UPC and DP. For no apparent reasons the UPM was left out of the agreement. According to the Group, this statement "had the effect of preserving the Proclamation in force whilst authorising Returning Officers and the Electoral Commission to publicly announce the results".
During all this time Obote and Muwanga were meeting in camera doctoring and concocting the results. After this, they “allowed” the Electoral Commission to announce the “results” which were doctored and concocted according to their wishes.
Muwanga's ill-fated Proclamation was published on the 11th day of December 1980 and not on the 10th as the government gazette purported. It is obvious that the Proclamation could not have been published on the 10th December and then deemed to have come into force on the same day. The date of 10th seems to be a fraudulent one. Although this date is stated to be the publication date, the Proclamation seems to have been enacted and published on the 11th of December.
The Military Commission dated the publication 10th December because that was their last day in power. It should be noted that their mandate had ceased on the date of 10th December which was the voting date. Above all, Muwanga as the Military Commission's Chairman, had no powers either on behalf of the Commission or on that of himself alone, to make any Proclamation.
The (Commonwealth Observers’) Report docs not mention anywhere the tact that by the time statutory power was restored to the Electoral Commission the Secretary to the Commission, plus three of the seven members of the Commission, who were all serving actively when the polling began, had disappeared from their offices.
The remaining four were all staunch UPC supporters and Obote’s appointees. On the 11th day of December, Vincent Ssekono, the Secretary to the Electoral Commission disappeared into thin air after he had been intimidated by Obote personally. According to Ssekono himself, he had been hurriedly summoned to Obote's home at Kololo to meet Obote who told him that if he, Ssekono, interfered with the UPC's victory he would be sent to the gallows. Obote told him that he and the U PC had fought against Amin and they therefore had to come to power at any cost. Frightened by this, Ssekono had to abandon the whole exercise and flee the country.
The Report only mentions Ssekono in thanking him for his "helpful and co-operatrive approach in facilitating our work". It does not at all mention his mysterious disappearance at the peak of the election exercise. The Group could not even mention the fact that ten days before the polling, Ssekono's personal assistant was shot dead at his home in Makindye by people in UNLA uniform who are believed to have been UNLA soldiers.
Uganda: Local Gov't PS Vincent Ssekkono Retires
The Monitor (Kampala)
Alfred Nyongesa Wandera
28 September 2008
Kampala — After several years of service as Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Local Government, Vincent Ssekono has called it quits.
Mr Ssekono is famously remembered as the former Electoral Commission Secretary who presided over the controversial 1980 general elections.
He fled the country after the then Military Commission Chairman and de facto President of Uganda; Paul Muwanga stopped him from announcing the poll results.
The Military Commission was the transitional government that organised the chaotic elections. Mr Ssekono presided over the elections that observers said were marred by massive rigging. President Yoweri Museveni, then Vice Chairman of the Military Commission vied for presidency as a candidate for Uganda Patriotic Movement.
Mr Museveni's party got only one parliament seat in the poll.
Mr Muwanga, who was a UPC diehard, issued a warning that the results of the polls were only to be released through his office.
The Uganda Peoples Congress was later declared winner in an election that was widely believed to have been won by the Democratic Party. Mr Vincent Ssekono, 62, has served for nine years in the Local Government Ministry. He joined the ministry on a contract basis.
Mr Ssekono, stayed in UK for seven years and on return to Uganda, worked as secretary in the Ministry of Health and in the Vice President's office before joining the Ministry of Local Government
NSSF loses sh23b in Safaricom shares
Wednesday, 4th November, 2009
By Madinah Tebajjukira
THE National Social Security Fund (NSSF) lost sh23b in a Kenyan telecom company investment, top management has revealed.
The acting managing director, Martin Bandeebire, yesterday said in April last year, NSSF bought 238,200,100 shares from Safaricom, at sh44b hoping to make profits.
However, a fall in the price of the shares by 30% led to the sh23b loss.
Appearing before the parliamentary committee on commissions, statutory and state enterprises, Bandeebire revealed that the decision to invest in Safaricom was approved under the leadership of Edward Gaamuwa, who was the board chairman.
The new board chairman, Vincent Ssekono, told a committee chaired by Reagan Okumu that though NSSF incurred losses, the company retained its shares in Safaricom.
He said chances are high that the loss will be offset this financial year.
“The stock exchange is a gamble. Many people invest and get losses but they don’t lose hope. That is business,” Ssekono said.
He asserted that, the board would carefully scrutinise any other investment plans.
“This is a lesson, but we can’t stop investing because the workers money needs to multiply,” he said.
Ssekono’s explanation angered the legislators who insisted that whoever initiated and approved the deal should be held responsible.
Ssekono said it was not only NSSF which made a loss but even other multi-international companies and individuals.
Safaricom’s share price dropped in June at the time when most companies bought shares at Ksh5 but later dropped to Ksh3.5.
“I think it is going to take some time before we see the share price return to what it should be. We have to wait for stability to return to world stock markets,” Safaricom chief executive Michael Joseph said.
He attributed the loss to the global economic crisis.
NSSF board and management had appeared before the committee to respond to management issues and to update them on plans to clean the fund’s image.
During the same meeting, Ssekono told the legislators that NSSF has obtained the land titles of the controversial Temangalo land, but it had no plans to develop it in the near future.
Though it is not the mandate of NSSF to clear the sitting tenants, Bandeebire said the fund is still faced with the problem of the Temangalo tenants demanding compensation.
He noted that the fund was more interested in developing the 560 acres in Lubowa, which were considered to be more prime than the land at Temangalo.
In Lubowa, Ssekono said NSSF intends to construct 2,000 housing units for sale.
Ssekono should know where his power begins and ends
Tuesday, 8th December, 2009
E-mail article E-mail article
Editor—The recent statements by the NSSF board chairman, Vincent Ssekono, carried on NSSF’s website that workers should not access their savings until they are 55 years old is not only annoying but uncalled for. Ssekono should know where his power begins and ends.
His work is to manage the NSSF and not to legislate. That is the work of Parliament. It is even more annoying for him, who has for long been a civil servant and does not own a cent in NSSF, to make such irresponsible and insensitive statements.
After getting his pension and gratuity as a permanent secretary and getting another job as NSSF chairman, his statement can only be interpreted as gloating!
Is he aware of Uganda’s life expectancy or is he just guessing to make such statements?
I urge Workers’ MP Sam Lyomoki and the entire Parliament to go on and pass the Bill allowing workers to access their savings when they are still alive and energetic enough to invest it. Ssekono need not worry about that as his fat sitting allowances will still be available since we
contribute billions of shillings every year at the pleasure of the powers that be.
Tema Kafeero
Nansana
NSSF chairman cancels IT tender: Source - http://www.iknowuganda.com/news/newsdetails.php?newsid=897
The new National Social Security Fund Board Chairman, Mr Vincent Ssekono, has started off his reign by cancelling a multi-million IT tender awarded by the previous board. Mr Ssekono in a May 28 letter to NSSF acting Managing Director Martin Bandebire said the contract for maintenance of the Fund’s Integrated Management Information System be advertised, ending the engagement of M/s Comtel Integrators Africa Ltd contracted by the previous board. NSSF has invested more than $ 6 million (approx. Shs12 billion) to build the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) an IT support system used to keep sensitive information on workers savings and the Fund’s investment portfolio. Mr Ssekono’s position came after Mr Bandebire on March 6 wrote and got approval of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority to award the $900,000 (about Shs2b) maintenance tender to Comtel, which had earlier installed the IMIS. Comtel which currently runs the system was through a competitive bidding process contracted by NSSF in November 2006 to do a diagnostic study at $430,000 (about Shs955m). Suspended NSSF Managing Director David Chandi Jamwa after getting clearance from the previous board directly contracted Comtel to implement the required changes at $ 5.4m (about Shs11b), an arrangement that attracted criticism from the PPDA. That contract ended in August 2008 but the NSSF managers retained Comtel to run the system . But Mr Ssekono’s latest position is in disagreement with the acting managing director who said when he wrote to the PPDA on March 6 that procuring a new consultant could lead to the collapse of the system. The board chairman’s position could leave the trillion Fund with another legal dispute following a Shs30 billion claim by construction company Alcon International whose contract to build Workers House was terminated in 1998 following shoddy work. That dispute is still before court. “This approach of direct procurement would be more cost effective as procuring a new service provider would set us back as the new consultants would have to refresh on the past problems, familiarise themselves with the current unique systems before they can provide maintenance services,” Mr Bandebire’s letter reads in part. He added: “NSSF cannot afford any more delays on the maintenance because of the risks involved in maintaining the delicate IMIS system and given the heavy investment cost already incurred.” In a May 8 letter, PPDA boss Edgar Agaba wrote to NSSF and granted a waiver on the argument that: “The application by NSSF to directly contract M/S Comtel for maintenance services of the IMIS is granted for one year. The approval is based on the need to safeguard the data and past investment incurred by NSSF on behalf of the workers in the IMIS to avoid a situation of different service provider trading excuses or blaming M/s Comtel Integrators Africa Ltd for design faults.” In his May 28 letter, Mr Ssekkono rejected Mr Bandebire’s arguments and instead ordered that the deal be opened for competition, leading to advertising of the tender on June 4. The new NSSF Chairman wrote: “I have carefully studied the letter and the views of Executive Director of PPDA. I would strongly advise that you advertise the procurement for a consultant to maintain the IMIS and invite bids using a competitive bidding method.” Disagreeing with Mr Ssekkono, Mr Bandebire explained that the request to use direct procurement was approved by the NSSF Executive Committee during their 97th meeting on January 14 and the NSSF Board of Directors in their 72nd meeting in December 2008. Daily Monitor failed to speak to Mr Ssekono. The NSSF Board chairman was not picking his calls on Saturday and Sunday as did the Comtel boss Ken Lubega. Under the new IMIS system, NSSF will be able to use e-mails which are more effective than delivering members’ fiscal information by post as paper statements in order to perk up efficiency. Prior to the IMIS technology, NSSF was issuing paper statements to its members on a regular basis and on request by walk-in members. However, issuing e-statements will enable efficient delivery of statements to members and also reduce transport costs.
MPs want PS Ssekono’s salary attached over sh2b: Source - http://www.etop.co.ug/detail.php?mainNewsCategoryId=4&newsCategoryId=84&newsId=622727
THE local government permanent secretary, Vincent Ssekono, risks losing his salary if he does not account for sh2.3b by 5:00pm today, reports Mary Karugaba.
The money was unspent balance for the financial year 2005/06. It was supposed to be returned to the Treasury.
MPs on the public accounts committee discovered that Ssekono had only transferred sh272m.
“Where did you put the balance? This is a lot of money,” committee chairman Nandala Mafabi said.
He told Ssekono that if he did not account for the money, the committee would sign a warrant demanding he pays it from his salary.
Ssekono and his principal accountant, Patrick Wamanyara, could not explain why the money was not returned to the Consolidated Fund.
Accounting regulations state that money not utilised by a ministry at the end of every financial year should be returned to the Treasury.
Wamanyara said the statement the MPs were reading had mistakes, which were corrected by the Accountant General, Gastavio Bwoch. But the statement had Wamanyara’s signature.
He attributed the problem to the new accounting format issued by Bwoch, forcing MP Frank Tumwebaze to wonder how the format could influence figures.
When MPs insisted, Wamanyara produced “correct” documents, which still had a difference of sh2.3b.
“Bwoch should be contacted to clarify,” Wamanyara said.
Although Ssekono asked for more time to account, he was only given hours.
“The money was passed through you. The Constitution gives you the responsibility to account, what should be done in case you fail?” Mafabi asked.
Is it true FDC is dishing out money?
While listening to Bukedde FM programme from 8.00pm - 9.00pm, someone said that he had seen FDC dish out money. If this is true, it is most unfortunate. We need a change in Uganda and if we are to get the change it should be for the better. It is moral decadance that makes people bribe others. When one campaigns he is to use tax payers' money to deliver services as expected. The bribing MUST be out of the ideal Uganda we are looking forward to.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
