Wednesday, September 7, 2011

THERE IS NO REFERANDA OR ANY GIVE-AWAY OF MABIRA


Those who are advocating for a REFERANDA on Mabira should forget it. The people of Uganda, using the commonsense they have have said there is no way Mabira forest can be given away for production of Sugar cane as the environment deteriorates on. This is obvious and should be respected by all who wish Uganda well. As for the Parliament, stand warned: As long as people elected you to represent them, stand for their will. How many did not go back to the 9th Parliament. Make your blunders but people will decide come the next election.
William Kituuka Kiwanuka

THE PICTURE OF UGANDA FORESTS
Before the rule of Idi Amin, Uganda had a relatively sound environmental record. During his reign (1971-1979), the forests suffered from civil and political strife. From 1971 to 1987, Uganda lost 50 percent of its forests, including virtually all of its primary forests.
Between 1990 and 2005, Uganda lost 26.3 percent of its remaining forest cover, and deforestation continues today at a rate of 2.2 percent per year, mostly due to subsistence farming, cutting for fuelwood, and colonization by the burgeoning population.
While Uganda is famous for its mountain gorillas, it is home to some of the highest concentrations of biodiversity in Africa. More than 5,000 plant species are found in the country along with 345 mammals, 1,015 birds, 165 reptiles, and 43 amphibians.

Uganda Forest Figures

Forest Cover
________________________________________
Total forest area: 3,627,000 ha
% of land area: 18.4%

Primary forest cover: n/a
% of land area: n/a
% total forest area: n/a

Deforestation Rates, 2000-2005
________________________________________
Annual change in forest cover: -86,400 ha
Annual deforestation rate: -2.2%
Change in defor. rate since '90s: 21.2%
Total forest loss since 1990: -1,297,000 ha
Total forest loss since 1990:-26.3%

Primary or "Old-growth" forests
Annual loss of primary forests: n/a
Annual deforestation rate: n/a
Change in deforestation rate since '90s: n/a
Primary forest loss since 1990: n/a
Primary forest loss since 1990:n/a

Forest Classification
________________________________________
Public: 29.8%
Private: 70.2%
Other: n/a
Use
Production: 14.9%
Protection: n/a
Conservation: 14.8%
Social services: n/a
Multiple purpose: n/a
None or unknown: 70.2

Forest Area Breakdown
________________________________________
Total area: 3,627,000 ha
Primary: n/a
Modified natural: 3,591,000 ha
Semi-natural: n/a
Production plantation: 36,000 ha
Production plantation: n/a

Plantations
________________________________________
Plantations, 2005: 36,000 ha
% of total forest cover: 1%
Annual change rate (00-05): 200,000 ha

Carbon storage
________________________________________
Above-ground biomass: 218 M t
Below-ground biomass: 59 M t

WE WILL STAND OUT FOR MABIRA SAY ACTIVISTS
By Monitor Reporter

Posted Wednesday, September 7 2011 at 00:00
Kampala

In as much as President Museveni said the decision to give away Mabira will depend on Parliament, activists have vowed to challenge legislators, should they concur with the President to give part of the forest land for sugarcane growing to Mehta.
The activists under their umbrella Save Mabira Crusade, argue that the laws in the Constitution, the National Forest and Tree Planting Act and the Land Act prohibit the person of the President or government from changing land use whether by permit or by lease, and that they shall seek public justice or international court to achieve their cause.
“Our position is clear, Mabira should not go under any circumstances, we have a legal and moral duty to protect the forest. It is illegal for the forest to be degazetted and Parliament does not have any legal stand to do so,” Mr Onesmus Mugyenyi, the deputy executive director Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment, said yesterday.
The crusaders also said they are imploring ways of criminalising and suing government through international courts of law for acts such as giving away public property.

HOW THE UGANDA 9th PARLIAMENT NUMBERS INCREASED FROM 319 IN 8th PARLIAMENT TO 375!

The 8th Parliament approved Government’s Amendments to various electoral laws; Government Amended the Electoral Commission Act, presidential Elections Act, the Parliamentary Elections Act and the Political Parties and organizations Act in preparation for the 2011 General Elections.

The Parliamentary Elections (Amendment) Bill, 2009: Amended the Parliamentary Elections Act, 2005 to require the Electoral Commission (EC) to declare a candidate elected unopposed where one of only two candidates withdraws or is disqualified for elections.

The Presidential Elections (Amendment) Bill, 2009: Amended the presidential Elections Act, 2005 to require the Electoral Commission (EC) to declare a candidate elected unopposed where one of only two candidates withdraws from an election.

The Electoral Commission (Amendment) Bill, 2009: Provides for the tenure of office of the Secretary of the Commission and prohibits the Electoral Commission (EC) from issuing duplicate Voters’ Cards on Polling Day.

The Political Parties and organizations (Amendment) Bill, 2009: Amended the Political Parties and organizations Act, 2005 to require political parties to cause to be published in the Gazette and to notify the Electoral Commission (EC) where any change occurs in the physical location of their office.

The National Youth Council (Amendment) Bill, 2008: Amended the National Youth Act to remove compulsory membership of every village youth resident aged between 18 and 30 years of a village youth council; to make the decisions of the village youth council binding on all youth I the village; to exclude non citizens from membership of a youth council; and related matters.

The National Women’s Council (Amendment) Bill, 2008: Amended the National Women’s Council Act to remove compulsory membership of a woman resident to a village council, to make the decisions of the village women council binding on all women in the village; to exclude non citizens from membership of a village women council, to provide for the Electoral Commission to compile, maintain, revise and update the Voters’ registers for the village women councils; and related matters.

The amendments were made at the end of the Fourth Session of the Eighth Parliament, May 19, 2010. On the same day, Parliament rejected a motion moved by the Shadow Attorney General, Erias Lukwago to present a Private Members’ Bill – the Constitution (Amendment) Bill intended to make “amendments to the Constitution to bring it in conformity with the demands of a multi-party political dispensation and political pluralism.

Other Bills passed during the Session include: the Stamps (Amendment) Bill, 2009; the Excise Tariff (Amendment) Bill, 2009; the Value Added Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2009; the Finance Bill, 2009; the Supplementary Appropriations Bill, 2009; and the Appropriations Bill, 2009; the Domestic Violence Bill, 2009; the Physical Planning Bill, 2008; the Whistle Blowers’ protection Bill, 2008; the International Criminal Court Bill, 2006; and the Trademarks Bill, 2008.

NEW DISTRICTS
Parliament approved the creation of 32 new districts, nine municipalities and fourteen counties that saw the number of legislators go up from 319 to 375 in the 9th Parliament (Excluding the Presidents’ appointees as Ministers who are ex-officios).
The new districts that took effect July 1, 2010 include among others:
i. Kalungu, this was part of Masaka district consisting of Kalungu county with its headquarters at Kalungu Trading Centre .
ii. Bukomansimbi, this was part of Masaka district consisting of Bukomansimbi county with its headquarters at Bukomansimbi Trading Centre.
iii. Gombe, was part of Mpigi district consisting of Butambala county with its headquarters at Gombe Trading Centre.
iv. Lwengo, was part of Masaka district consisting of part of Bukoto county comprising the sub-counties of Malongo, Kyazanga, Lwengo, Ndagwe, Kisekka and Kingo with its headquarters at Lwengo Trading Centre.
v. Mitooma, previously part of Bushenyi district consisting of Ruhinda country with its headquarters at Mitooma Trading Centre.

AFTER DISTRICTS, MPs OKAY NINE NEW COUNTIES

Emmanuel Gyezaho

6 May 2010
Only a day after Parliament sanctioned the creation of 15 new districts, lawmakers yesterday went a step further and endorsed a government request to create nine new counties.
The decision, which came after heated exchanges from the opposition and government, effectively increases the number of MPs for the next Parliament.
Those numbers are set to increase if the House adopts a government request presented yesterday for the creation of nine new municipalities.
Deputy Speaker Rebecca Kadaga, however, deferred debate on the request and referred the matter to the House's Public Service and Local Government Committee.
As it stands now, the 9th Parliament, expected to come into force after the 2011 general election, will be 60 seats bigger than the current House.
Currently there are 333 MPs in the 8th Parliament. But with 14 new districts created last year--and another 15 approved last week, plus yesterday's nine new counties, the 9th Parliament will be 400-people strong.

By law, each of the new districts will have a female MP.
Presenting the request, Local Government Minister Adolf Mwesige told MPs that the government considered it necessary to create the new counties "for the effective representation and administration of those areas" after taking into account means of communication, geographical features, population density and the "wishes of the people concerned."
But MPs queried the timing of the request, the criteria used in selecting the new counties and whether the government had the money to provide for new parliamentary seats.
"By creating a new county, we are only creating new MPs but not bringing services closer to the people," said Ms Mary Mugyenyi (Nyabushozi, NRM), "because counties are not administrative units."

Small chambers
"Yesterday [Tuesday] we created districts; these are more counties. That means more members of parliament, but where is the money to put up a new chamber?" asked Bukanga MP Nathan Byanyima. "Shall we continue to sit on each other?"
His query prompted Deputy Speaker Rebecca Kadaga to inform MPs that Parliament had secured necessary funds for the construction of a new chamber, even though she didn't state how much. "We are soon going to break ground," she said.
Built by the colonial regime, the current parliamentary chambers were designed to accommodate only 80 MPs. Opposition MPs then moved to block the government request, citing constitutional provisions to compel the minister present statistics on population figures which necessitate the splitting of parent counties.
Others found moment to question why requests from their home districts for new counties had not been included on the list but the voices in favour of the new counties settled the debate.
Finance Minister Syda Bbumba told MPs that the government has the necessary money to provide for the new administrative units.

UGANDA’S PROBLEMS ARE PARTLY A RESULT OF FINANCIAL INDISCIPLINE OR IRRESPONSIBILITY BY THOSE IN CHARGE AS REFLECTED IN AUDITOR GENERAL’S REPORT FOR TH

It is not clear why Government bank accounts in Bank of Uganda have continued to be overdrawn 9as per this report) despite the instruction by Treasury to the Central Bank not to have overdrawn accounts. Is it possible that this is done as a response to instructions from above?
It is difficult to belief that the Accountant General on being asked about 11 non-performing loans worth shs 35,193,062,617 that were found without any supporting documentation (e.g. loan agreements), he explained that the loan agreements were lost when a Consultancy contracted to validate the debts in 1991/92 failed to hand back the loan agreements and that efforts to trace the firm and loan agreements proved futile!
It disturbs to learn that The Accountant General has time and time again reported mis-postings; errors on bank statements, delays to respond to queries and certificate of bank balances being wrongly advised to accounting officers who do not own such accounts. Government accounts in the Central Bank are occasionally overdrawn due to errors, duplicated payments despite Treasury explicit instructions not to allow overdrawn accounts. How on earth can any one accept such lame excuses? For those in the know, Bank of Uganda does not employ lousy staff; many employees are 1st Class degree holders, how on earth can a wrong statement be sent out? Are there no people who check these transactions? How is balancing possible? It is most likely that these errors are committed when those involved do them with a hidden agenda.
It is sad to learn of ‘games being played’ in form of many unexplained transactions referred to as “revalues” and “reversals” are reflected on the Bank Statements and in most cases wiping away the would be – credit balances on these accounts!
It is sad to read of reports like, “Details on Bank Account No. 208209038.1 show that shs 15,199,144,438 was received by the Bank and credited on this account on 6th June 2007. This amount was wiped away by various unexplained transactions and by 30th June 2007, the account showed a debt balance of shs 4,446,462,344. The account was subsequently reconstructed following communication and meetings between the European Commission, Bank of Uganda and the Accountant General which resolved that all transactions wrongly made on the account be reversed resulting into a new credit balance of shs 8,173,566,995. However, the final position of this account was not accordingly adjusted in the accounts.”

THE DETAILED REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash Balances
For the period ended 30.06.07, Government reported a consolidated cash and bank balance of shs 2,411,748,703,028 and bank overdrafts shs 1,234,571,805,723 on all bank accounts operated by the Treasury and Central Government ministries. It includes balances with the Bank of Uganda for both the Consolidated Fund and for various votes and for all project Accounts. There is no comprehensive information on the overall stock of Government bank accounts held both in Bank of Uganda and commercial banks to enable the Auditor General undertake audit procedures to confirm the completeness and accuracy of the balances and accuracy of the balances reported.
Besides cash balances on donor funded project bank accounts particularly those still in commercial banks are not captured in accordance with the accounting policy followed on consolidation of Project expenditure.
The absence of a comprehensive data on bank accounts further makes it difficult to periodically circularize and reconcile Government bank accounts and balances for authenticity, purpose, obsolescence/redundancy and excessive liquidity, and illegal overdraws.

Redundant and Overdrawn Accounts
Bank records indicate that 153 bank accounts did not record any transactions for the whole financial year under review. One hundred and thirty three (133) of the accounts had redundant credit balances worth shs 32,199,268,269 while twenty (20) were overdrawn to the tune of shs 11,160,722,951. Government bank accounts in Bank of Uganda have continued to be overdrawn despite the instruction by Treasury to the Central Bank not to have overdrawn accounts.
Foreign Debt
A review of the Foreign Debt portfolio showed that Government was in arrears on twenty one (21) loans that had been due for repayment. According to the DMFAS data base, total principal in respect of the 21 loans as at 30 June 2007 was shs 202,300,014,509. For over 10 years, there had not been any movements in the principal values either in terms of repayments, rescheduling or otherwise. It was explained that the decision not to pay the loans was based on the Paris Club agreement that required all creditors to deliver HIPC initiative debt relief to countries under HIPC 1 and 2.
Included in the 21 non-performing loans were 11 loans worth shs 35,193,062,617 without any supporting documentation (e.g. loan agreements). The Accountant General explained that the loan agreements were lost when a Consultancy contracted to validate the debts in 1991/92 failed to hand back the loan agreements and that efforts to trace the firm and loan agreements proved futile.

Receivable (Outstanding Government Loans)
In the Auditor General’s report to Parliament on Public Accounts of the Republic of Uganda for the year ended 30th June 2006, he said that Government loans totaling shs 1,242,928,209,265 to state and private enterprises were still outstanding. As at 30th June 2007, shs 1,205,608,734,946 was outstanding as a number of enterprises had partially paid up while some debts were wholly or partially cancelled. It was noted that Loans worth shs 620,884,726,162 had not been performing for a very long time. Their recovery is highly doubtful.
Finance Costs
Finance costs in respect of interest on Treasury Repo stocks/transactions amounting to shs 15,774,825,032 accumulated over the years; including shs 5,703,149,467 for the period under review were never recognized or expensed in the accounts, accordingly overstating Government equity. The Accountant General explained that he was hesitant to recognize the expenditure because he could not measure it reliably since no database or records were maintained at the Treasury. He added that the liability was picked from the statement of Government position from Bank of Uganda and that consultations between his office and Bank of Uganda were still going on to explore the possibility of having monthly returns upon which reconciliations were to be carried out.
Treasury Bonds
During the period under review, Treasury Bonds worth shs 184,370,732,115 matured and were accordingly redeemed. However, the debits on the Treasury Bond Investment Account in respect of these redemptions amounted to shs 157,083,500,000 only. The variance of shs 27,287,232,115 was not satisfactorily explained.
The Accountant General explained that the bonds figure presented in the accounts (shs 184,370,732,115) fully reconciled with bank of Uganda Central Depository Treasury Bond redemption profile for the period under review.

Government Non-Resource Taxes (NRT)
During the period under review, Parliament appropriated shs 181,959,964,445 for various Votes to afford import taxes (Non-Resource Taxes) on machinery, furniture and motor vehicles. In accordance with tax reforms introduced during the period, a total of shs 180,990,628,113 in respect of these taxes was released to various Votes with instructions to “Issue block cheques (i.e., for the entire tax release)” to the Treasury. This money was deposited on two Bank of Uganda accounts; TREASURY OFFICE ACCOUNTS GROSS RECEIPTS ACCOUNT and TREASURY OFFICE ACCOUNTS GROSS PAYMENT ACCOUNT. As at 30th June 2007 shs 137,600,572,275 was lying idle on the Gross receipts account. In many instances it was noted that Votes were appropriated tax funds far in excess of requirements, consequently eroding away funds available for allocation to other priorities within the Vote’s MTEF provisions. It was also noted that in a number of cases, tax obligations were paid for in excess of the individual tax appropriations for the Vote. For example, Ministry of Education had its tax obligations for the Vote settled on its behalf by Treasury yet it did not have an appropriation for it. The Accountant General explained that this was the first year of operating the Gross Tax System and certain modalities may have not been finalized. He indicated that once reconciliations with URA are finalized, the amounts standing on the account will be transferred to the UCF.

Treasury Transactions with the Central Bank
1. Transaction Delays, Errors and Mis-postings
The transfer of all Government bank accounts from commercial banks to the Central Bank created increased volume of Government transactions with the Central Bank. The Accountant General has time and time again reported mis-postings; errors on bank statements, delays to respond to queries and certificate of bank balances being wrongly advised to accounting officers who do not own such accounts. Government accounts in the Central Bank are occasionally overdrawn due to errors, duplicated payments despite Treasury explicit instructions not to allow overdrawn accounts. There are also some times delays in creating Treasury Bank accounts. For instance a total of Euros 3,599,000 (Equivalent to shs 8,193,624,393) was released to Bank of Uganda Account 208209070.1 for Poverty Action Fund on 27th June 2007 by KfW in support of the Poverty reduction Support Credit V-VI. The Central Bank communicated to the Accountant General on 10th July 2007 having received the funds. However, the Bank Statement indicates that the grant equivalent of shs 8,193,624,393 was credited to the Account on 31st August 2007, more than two months after receipt of the money.
In another instance, shs 37,296,972,081 transferred from the Customs & Excise A/C on 24th November 2006, 50 days later although the transfers should be done twice a week.
2. Commission Charges
For all transactions denominated in foreign currency, the Central bank charges Government a commission at the rate of 1% on the gross amount. Only the net amounts are posted to the respective bank accounts and the commission charged is posted to a special account meant for Project Bank charges. During the year, total bank charges under Treasury amounted to shs 9,238,011,970 of which shs 8,096,403,082 was posted to this account in respect of commission and charges arising from foreign currency related transactions. The rate and amounts charged appear to be on the high side.
3. Unexplained Transactions on holding Accounts
Budget Support Grants from the donors are kept on holding accounts in the Central Bank before their transfer to the Consolidated Fund. When the grants are received, the Foreign Currency is translated to local currency using the rate at the time (day) and the proceeds credited to the holding account in local currency after the Bank has charged a commission of 1% of the gross amount.
However, many unexplained transactions referred to as “revalues” and “reversals” are reflected on the Bank Statements and in most cases wiping away the would be – credit balances on these accounts.
Details on Bank Account No. 208209038.1 show that shs 15,199,144,438 was received by the Bank and credited on this account on 6th June 2007. This amount was wiped away by various unexplained transactions and by 30th June 2007, the account showed a debt balance of shs 4,446,462,344. The account was subsequently reconstructed following communication and meetings between the European Commission, Bank of Uganda and the Accountant General which resolved that all transactions wrongly made on the account be reversed resulting into a new credit balance of shs 8,173,566,995. However, the final position of this account was not accordingly adjusted in the accounts.

Debt Swap
Over the years, Government has been involved in a series of debt-swaps involving mainly state enterprises listed for divestiture. Although the funds involved are quite colossal, in many instances the debt swaps are never reported in Government’s financial statements and thus are not subject to routine financial audits by the Auditor General.
The Accountant General explained that the initiation of the debt-swap process is done by the affected state enterprise through the Ministry of Finance which then starts the process of debt-swap by constituting a Debt Settlement Committee whose role is to verify the extent of Government’s indebtedness with the assistance of the internal audit department. The committee then makes recommendations based on the findings. On the basis of the recommendations, the Ministry approves and implements the debt-swap by preparing the necessary agreements in consultation with the Solicitor General and presents it to cabinet and subsequently to Parliament for approval. It is after approval by Parliament that the indebtedness of the enterprise is reduced in Government of Uganda records.

Domestic Arrears
Existing procedures require that the arrears are verified by Treasury Service Department in conjunction with the internal audit and inspectorate and registered in an IT based domestic arrears database maintained at the Treasury.
However, a reconciliation of verified domestic arrears database maintained at the Treasury and the actual arrears reported in the financial statements of various Ministries, Agencies, Departments, Universities and Missions revealed variances. In some instances the arrears reported in the financial statements were more or less than those captured in the Treasury database.

Sunday, September 4, 2011

MUSEVENI'S ATTACK OF THE WEST OVER GADAFI DOES NOT MAKE HIM A LESS DICTATOR




By Yasiin Mugerwa

Posted Monday, August 29 2011 at 00:00

In Summary

President says Africa of today is not the same as that of 100 years ago. He adds that African Union is calling for dialogue in Libya.

President Museveni has reiterated his criticism of the West and attacked Nato for disorganising a friend, whose 42-year rule faces a humbling end.
Speaking at the annual Muslims Iftar dinner at State House, Entebbe on Saturday, Mr Museveni addressed himself on two fundamental issues: The economic crisis at home and the battle for Libya. He accused the West of greed and defended Col. Gaddafi’s mistakes even though, he said, the Libyan leader attempted to go behind his back to hijack his chiefs in Kampala.
“Gaddafi had his own mistakes, he came here and organised my chiefs without telling me. We cancelled that meeting and I warned chiefs because it was wrong,” Mr Museveni said. “But Gaddafi built a mosque for us and as a leader, he had his mistakes, but those Europeans have more mistakes and problems. They think the rest of us are fools except themselves. When there are riots in Africa, they call them pro-democracy and in London, they call them, criminals.”

Mabira talk
Although, Mufti Ramadhan Mubajje had questioned the proposal to give away part of Mabira Forest to Mehta Group to grow more sugarcane, the President brushed off the matter that has caused apprehension in the country under the carpet.
Offering a sneak-peek into the decision of last week’s African Union meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Mr Museveni said: “Those Europeans should know that Africa of today is not Africa of 100 years ago or even 50 years ago. Yesterday (Friday), we had a meeting and Africa is taking a decision to defend Africa’s independence. We want dialogue in Libya and we want a cessation of hostilities.”
President Museveni, however, said the war in Libya took the African Union by Surprise but promised the organisation, that has refused to recognise the rebel would work to resolve the conflict in Libya peacefully. “It took us by surprise but we are going to sort it out.”
The African Union has not recognised the National Transition Council, although individual members such as Egypt, Senegal, Nigeria, Tunisia and Burkina Faso have done so.

THE PROFESSIONALS WHO SHOULD BE PAID MONEY IN UGANDA AND NOT THE LOUSY POLITICIANS


A day in the life of an ENT surgeon- A patient’s recovery is his bundle of joy
Edison Babigamba
By Ivan Okuda

Posted Sunday, September 4 2011 at 00:00
I am called Edison Babigamba, an Ear, Nose and Throat surgeon at Mulago Hospital, lecturer at College Of Health Sciences, Makerere University and proprietor of Precious Clinic in Wandegeya. My day begins at 6am, with watching the news. Then I get to Mulago Hospital by 7.30am. When I am on duty, I work 24 hours, the same applies for emergency duty. If I am not at Mulago or lecturing, then I am in private practice, either in my clinic or other private hospitals. On many days, I forego lunch because I can’t leave patients in pain and go for food. That is why you don’t find fat doctors; we don’t have regular eating habits.
But when it comes to family life, I am very principled and give my family quality time.On Sundays, save for church, I don’t leave my house, that is time for me to interact with my children and wife, with exception of emergency operations at Mulago like the bomb blasts last year. Even if you called me for money, I would not oblige.
In my profession, one gets accustomed to unpleasant sights. I get patients with pus filled ears, rotting noses and throats. That is why a patient’s recovery is my bundle of joy, not money because it is like food that one can never get enough of.
Like many colleagues will tell you, my biggest challenge is poor pay, worsened by escalating food prices and then lack of equipment to handle cases that we inevitably refer abroad.

MURAMUZI IS CORRECT ABOUT MUSEVENI

Seven Questions-“This country does not belong to Museveni”

Executive Director of the National Association of Professional Environmentalists, Mr Frank Muramuzi
By Risdel Kasasira

Posted Saturday, September 3 2011 at 18:00

In Summary

The proposal by the government to giveaway Mabira Forest has sparked a big debate across the country with environmental activists threatening to repeat the kind of demonstrations that degenerated into riots in 2009 and left a number of people dead. After the riots government was forced to abandon the proposed giveaway. But in the renewed debate, President Museveni has said he is determined to give the forest to Sugar Corperation of Uganda Ltd, for sugarcane planation. The Executive Director of the National Association of Professional Environmentalists, Mr Frank Muramuzi, spoke to Sunday Monitor.

1. Why are you against the give-away of a small part of Mabira Forest to produce sugar which has become increasingly expensive and Ugandans cannot afford it?
Yes, we have the scarcity of sugar but Mabira is more important than these crystals for purposes of human life. We can plant sugarcane in other places, not in Mabira. There is no way you will transplant this forest to another area in Uganda but you can plant sugarcane in another place. That’s why we are against the giveaway of a third of this forest. If Mabira is given away, it will be the worst precedent because you will see many other forests going in this similar manner. While we appreciate the need to increase the production of sugar in the country, we should also know the importance of forests in Uganda. If I can tell; in the next 20 to 30 years, the rate at which the forests are being degraded, we shall remain with no forests and that will be a disaster for the country and the generations to come.

2.You can stop government from giving away the forest to Mehta but will you stop threats like human settlements and food cultivation to the forests as a result of high population growth rate?
If we accept to bow down to the population pressure and allow forests to be cut, allow people to settle in swamps, reclaim lakes and river, this country will be trouble in the future. I know in the last 20 years, we were 20 million people, meaning that in the next 20 years, we shall be 60million and in 60 years, we will be 100 million. But that does not mean that we are going to remove all the lakes, rivers and forests. We have to learn how to live with this increasing population. Get other ways and means of meeting the increasing population needs but not cut trees. We might also need to limit the population.

3.What would be the environmental impact if one third of Mabira forest is cut for sugarcane plantation?
That forest is not only important for this country but the whole region, if not the whole world. Being a water catchment for Lake Victoria and River Nile, it is important for our electricity generation, lives of millions of people depend on Lake Victoria, we are talking about transportation across the region, fisheries on Lake Victoria, medicines and others. But also in the era of climate change, that forest alone can attract millions of dollars into this country in form of carbon trading. The world can give us money to protect the forest such that it can generate oxygen for us but also absorb carbon dioxide. We have already got three million dollars from carbon trading.

4.There are those who say that you actually not fighting for maintenance of Mabira Forest but conniving with the opposition to frustrate government projects. They also say that you have incited sectarian sentiments because Mehta is a Ugandan of Asian origin.

No, the need to have this forest conserved is beyond Muramuzi, it’s bigger than Mehta, it’s bigger than politicians, the President and other political groups. It’s 30 million Ugandans who are at risk. The figure is even more than 30 million because you have Tanzanians, Kenyans, Egyptians and Sudanese whose lives are at risk if this forest is degraded. Those political groups you are talking about including, Parliament, Cabinet, the army and police are small entities compared to the importance of Mabira. For sectarianism, I have never mentioned anyone’s origin in this campaign. I have talked about traders and businessmen involved, not races. The environmental catastrophe that may come as a result of cutting down the forests does not know people’s races, religion and tribes. I have many friends who are Indians. They are very good people. What I’m saying is, that businessman [Mehta] should respect the interests of Ugandans.

5.Government says the bigger part of Mabira has been cut by the people living around the forest and that the part to be given to Mehta has already been degraded.

That’s rubbish and ignorance of those advancing that argument. When we talk about reservation, we don’t talk about only trees. Secondly, if people have cut the trees, that shouldn’t be an excuse of giving the land away. They should instead plant trees. Some people are just thriving on ignorance.

6.What do you plan to do if government goes ahead and gives this forest away?
We have already drawn a redline and people should know that this country does not belong to only a clique or a group people, it belongs to 30 million Ugandans. Uganda does not belong to the President or Cabinet, there is a bigger authority and that’s the people of Uganda. There is no way they will sit as a cocoon of ministers and giveaway that highly-valued natural resource and think Ugandans will keep quiet. The army, police, Cabinet and the President are employees of the 30 million people. I urge Parliament not to approve this suicidal plan. We have groups that have gone to Kenya, Rwanda and other countries to fight this plan. We are in touch with the World Bank over this matter. There is an indemnity agreement between the government of Uganda and the World Bank to protect this forest. In this agreement, the World Bank agreed that we can have Bujagali project but protect Mabira. We are calling upon the World Bank to prevail over these selfish people.

7.Are you sure all 30 million Ugandans support you?
If government has any doubts, let them put it on a referendum. Let the President and his Cabinet put this issue on the vote. That’s when they will know that Ugandans are not with them on this issue.

rkasasira@ug.nationmedia.com

IT IS TRUE, IN UGANDA IT IS AN AUTOCRATIC REGIME IN STEERING

It surprises me that to-date the NRM Government cannot accept its mistakes. It is sad that after 25 years in power, the NRM could make blunders that are leading to strikes in the country. It is simply common sense that a teacher or any salaried person getting peanuts can deceive Government to keep working on when the salary cannot take him or her for a week. The arrogance of NRM leadership if not changed this country is in big shit. Some leaders in NRM have shamelessly looted the country and now instead of Government realizing their mistakes, they are busy threatening people. This is rubbish. If NRM is not capable of managing the country, the best is to quit instead of taking people for fools after messing up. What is sad is the way some of our leaders think that they should be the controllers of all the wealth of this country. The NRM revolution has now turned a curse to the people of Uganda. However, as a believer, I think God will not forget us. The way this country is being looted by a few, the way some people show their wealth moreover ill gotten is shocking. The prayer is that our leaders get back to ground and think about the welfare of those people whose wealth they have looted over years.
William Kituuka Kiwanuka

MUSEVENI IS AUTOCRATIC - NAGENDA

By Richard Wanambwa

Posted Saturday, September 3 2011 at 18:00
The Senior Presidential Adviser on Media Affairs, Mr John Nagenda, has described President Museveni, his boss for close to 25 years, as a “mischievous” and “autocratic” leader.
Mr Nagenda, a respected media personality and one of Uganda’s best spin doctors, said Mr Museveni no longer listens to wise counsel and is surrounded by opportunists and sycophants.
“I don’t think he has remained exactly the same though, in fact, I would say that he is more autocratic than he was when he first came,” Mr Nagenda said in an exclusive interview with Sunday Monitor, at his Muyenga home.
He candidly noted that the President has changed over the last 25 years, become “all powerful” and has since lost the courageous and independent minded advisors and ministers he previously had around him.
“… But when you get somebody who is now all powerful, it really hurts me when there are meetings or press conferences and whenever, the President says something and you ask yourself “what did he mean?” but the others laugh and cheer him on,” he said in reference to Cabinet, which according to him lacks the spine to stand up to the President whenever there is a contentious issue.
Mr Nagenda’s observation comes hot on the heels on the proposal by the President to give more than 7,000 hectares of land of Mabira Forest to the Sugar Corporation of Uganda to grow sugarcane. The proposal has caused public outcry to stop the move yet there seems to be an ill-omened silence from his Cabinet.
The provocative but humorous presidential adviser disagrees with his boss over the proposal calling it “unwise” and called on Ugandans to resist it. Mr Museveni argues that the decision would increase sugar production and help solve the current sugar shortage in the country.
He called on Ugandans to stand up and speak out on issues affecting the country’s development.
“But unless everyone of us takes the opportunity to say what we think is right, then we are going to find ourselves in a completely different time because there will be one person deciding, surrounded by his acolyte and may that day never come and may Ugandans come out and with respect say to their leader; “You have been a very good leader to us and don’t ruin it.”
According to Mr Nagenda, recent opposition within Cabinet has surprisingly been led by none other than the President’s wife, Janet Museveni, who he prays should convince the President not to give away part of Mabira Forest.
In this interview, Mr Nagenda speaks about a wide range of issues, including the two people who he thinks can replace President Museveni and dissects the workings and character of the opposition.

rwanambwa@ug.nationmedia.com

TEACHERS TO RESUME STRIKE
By Mercy Nalugo & Abudu Kiyaga

Posted Saturday, September 3 2011 at 18:00
As the new school term opens tomorrow, teachers under their umbrella organisation- Uganda National Teachers Union (Unatu), have maintained that they will not teach unless the dispute over their salary increment is settled by government.
“We should not be repeating ourselves on this, our stand is still on,” Unatu spokesperson Teopista Birungi told Sunday Monitor.
Teachers are currently pushing for a 100 per cent pay rise. Union officials called off the first strike in July, pending negotiations with the government, that have since flopped. They now maintain that the strike resumes tomorrow.
The government on the other hand insists there is no money for salary increase this financial year and has threatened to take disciplinary action against teachers who will participate in the strike.
“Our head teachers are receiving a lot of intimidation from Resident District Commissioners and police in various districts but we are not changing our position about this,” Ms Birungi said.
This week, Parliament unsuccessfully pushed government to increase the teachers’ salaries by 50 per cent this financial year and another half in the next two years.
The report by the Committee on Social Services presented by its chairperson, Dr Sam Lyomoki, before Parliament, recommended a phased increase in the salaries of all teachers beginning with a 20 per cent increment this financial year.
Cutting down on wasteful expenditures like seminars, entertainment, travel inland, travel abroad, fuels, vehicle maintenance and repairs among others would realise the money.
The committee then proposed that government achieve the 100 per cent within the next three years. However, some MPs were opposed to the move.
“The 100 per cent demand for teachers’ salaries did not start today. Let the increment be effected or else we don’t approve their budget. There is waste expenditure in each ministry where we can get the money,” Mr Francis Epetait (Ngora County) said. The Prime Minister, Mr Amama Mbabazi and a number of ministers argued that there was no money to effect the increase.
“We cannot pass such a resolution. The rise is not a one-time payment but it’s continuous. Besides when you start cherry-picking, other civil servants will also come out to complain. In order not to incite others to strike, we shall give them a salary rise across the board,” Mr Mbabazi said.
“How come the government identified Shs102b to give to an individual called businessman Hassan Basajjabalaba and it is saying there is no money for teachers?,’ Leader of Opposition, Mr Nandala Mafaabi, said.

mnalugo@ug.nationmedia.com

STRIKING LECTURERS LIKELY TO FACE DISMISSAL
It cannot solve the problem dismissing all lecturers may be that will be the beginning of the fall of Museveni's Government. The problem is management of the economy. Once the Government fails then the outcome is what we see today. We told Ugandans that President Museveni was tired as is common with a person overstaying in power in a situation like Uganda. Instead of quitting the President decided to change the Constitution to have unlimited term, he is increasing districts every other day just to see himself in power but what about the other players in the economy?
William Kituuka

By Abdu Kiyaga
Posted Saturday, September 3 2011 at 18:00
Makerere University Council is pondering dismissal of lecturers, following a strike that has now entered day four.
The university’s highest decision making body, deliberated about the strike on Friday and according to sources that attended the meeting, resolved to send letters of ultimatum to the lectures on Monday to return to work in a week’s time or face suspension from work.
“Whoever will not return to work, will be suspended,” the sources, who did not want to be quoted because they are not allowed to speak on behalf of the University Council said.
At the meeting, according to the sources, some Council members also tried to move a resolution to have all the striking lecturers suspended and put on half pay as per Employment Act, 2006 but such a proposal was dropped because of the likely legal repercussions.
University Council Chairman Eng. Charles Wana-Etyem said the meeting had decided to meet the minister of Education, before a final resolution is communicated. He denied that the striking lecturers would be suspended.
“It is still premature to announce when the university will be opened but it will not be in a week’s time,” Wana-Etyem earlier told journalists.
Just hours after the closure of the University on Thursday, some Council members protested Eng. Charles Wana-Etyem’s decision to order the P. 3
Closure without consultation from other members and stakeholders.
“He does not have any mandate to take that decision and he will be responsible for the circumstances. The constitution does not allow him to do that,” Mr Benard Luyiga, who is a council member said just after Eng. Wana-Etiem announced the closure of the university.
Eng. Wana-Etiem, however, reportedly apologised during the meeting saying that he had got orders from officials and he thought that was the only way the situation at the university could be tamed.